Give me your Sam Bowie and your Greg Oden and I will laugh
at your definition of bust. Meet Michael Olowokandi. He had a mediocre horror
film inspired nickname (The Kandi Man), but that was about the only thing
inspired about him or his career. The Clippers, the perennial draft choke
artists, took a gamble. And they bust. As usual. This time, just bigger. Look
at a draft with five All-Stars and with two or three Hall of Famers and they
took a guy who scored a career with 12.3 points per game while shooting a near
career low from the field.
The thought of that draft pick, with Vince Carter and Dirk
Nowitski (both TRADED on draft night) and Paul Pierce just sitting there, it
makes me cringe. It is another vibrant note of what the Clippers might have
been had they drafted well. A franchise could have been stabilized with
Nowitski or Pierce at the helm.
It was also a weird year for trades, with the 4th,
5th, 6th and 9th picks swapped. It was like
teams knew what they wanted, but really didn’t.
And then there was Orlando .
While the draft helped turn around the Mavericks, Kings and Raptors and set
into motion a return plan for Boston ,
it was Orlando who could have potentially struck gold. Instead, they turned
their three top-15 picks into Michael Doleac, Keon Clark and Matt Harpring.
Tragic. Just tragic. They managed to be a 3-seed in the playoffs after a
lockout shortened 1998-99 season, but when Penny Hardaway’s support system as
these three, there is not question why Allen Iverson took them to the wood shed
in the playoff’s opening round.
Pick 1: Los Angeles
Clippers
Who they took: Michael Olowokandi
Who they should have took: Dirk Nowitski (9th
pick)
Why: This was a class it was hard to choose who should be
the first pick, but Nowitski gets the nod. He was looked at as raw, but long
enough to play either forward spots, or even center, once his body reached his
potential. He did so quickly in Dallas
(good job Milwaukee , trading him is
almost like Charlotte trading Kobe ).
By far the best German born NBA player ever, maybe the best German basketball
player ever and easily one of the best jump shooting 7-footers ever. He would
have been a homerun for the Clippers instead of the debilitating strike out
they went with instead.
Pick 2: Vancouver
Grizzlies
Who they took: Mike Bibby
Who they should have took: Paul Pierce (10th
pick)
Why: After his ex-Kansas teammate bombed in the draft the
year before, there was probably some concern about Pierce. After all, Kansas
was producing quality college players who were mediocre at best pros (see ‘Blue
Devils, Duke’ for more reference on that). Pierce broke that mold. At a time
where one player, one identity was what Memphis
yearned for, Pierce could have been that like he became for the Celtics.
Especially after a move to Memphis ,
Pierce could have been a Grizzlies lifer, forever altering their franchise and
sadly the Celtics too, just not in a good way. And while Bibby was a good pick
for Vancouver , they didn’t get his
best years while Pierce would have proved to be the most valuable piece in
franchise history and their first Hall of Famer.
Pick 3: Denver
Nuggets
Who they took: Raef LaFrentz
Who they should have took: Vince Carter (5th
pick)
Why: Even though he has fattened with age, Carter still is a
terrific player as seen by his highlight reel buzzer beater in this year’s
playoffs. But take that away and in 1998 you still have an explosive
get-to-the-basket scorer who could glide through the air with ease. The next
‘Next Jordan’ was probably the closest thing to the original because of how he
soared and the awe in which people were in when the man shortly dubbed ‘Air Canada ’
took flight. NBA dunk contest win with some of the best dunks ever? Check.
Leaping OVER a defender for Team USA
to dunk? Check. And turning around the Raptors franchise? Check. They could
have used any one of those rubs in Denver ,
where the Nuggets were continuing a pace of downright pathetic.
Pick 4: Toronto
Raptors
Who they took: Antwan Jamison (traded to Warriors)
Who they should have took: Mike Bibby (2nd pick)
Why: Bibby put up a hectic pace on the court, really picking
up where he left off at Arizona
and was a catalyst in the early years for the other Canadian club. Unlike most
guys, especially of this era, I think that Bibby was right coming out after his
sophomore year as the NBA was better development for his game than college
would have been. While Carter, the eventual Raptor from this draft, was the
perfect pick up, he realistically possibly wouldn’t be available here so Bibby
would have been a pretty great pickup to team with Tracy McGrady in a drive and
dish team.
Pick 5: Golden State
Warriors
Who they took: Vince Carter (traded to Raptors)
Who they should have took: Antwan Jamison (4th
pick)
Why: They got him anyway. So it was the right pick all along.
He was supposed to be Carter’s equal in the ever expanding line of freak UNC
athletes (see ‘Stackhouse, Jerry’) and he never panned out in that manner but
was still helpful every single place he landed from 1998 through this past
season. He mustered together All-Star seasons in Dallas and Washington after he
built up a reputation as a dangerous scorer in Golden State where he twice
scored 51 points in a game. The Warriors made the right choice here, though I
would like to re-free agency for them so they could try to hold onto the career
18.5 ppg scorer into his All-Star years.
Pick 6: Dallas
Mavericks
Who they took: Robert Traylor (traded to Milwaukee )
Who they should have took: Brad Miller (undrafted)
Why: Dallas
clearly needed to go big and they made the wrong choice to do that with before
trading the same night for the way right choice. But with Nowitski off the
board and Robert Traylor being a laughable choice today, Miller would have a
perfect fit. The reality is, he wasn’t going to turn around the franchise like
Nowitski did, but he was a guy who steadily improved each and every year,
culminating with back-to-back All-Star appearances (yes, as an undrafted
player) for two different teams. He only averaged 6.3 ppg and 3.1 rpg as a
rookie (though still an undrafted one) in Charlotte, but never put up lower
numbers except for in his final season once his body was pretty well done over
his career low 15 games in 2011-2012.
Pick 7: Sacramento
Kings
Who they took: Jason Williams
Who they should have took: Rashard Lewis (32nd
pick)
Why: In a draft with a lot of talent, it’s hard to drop down
the draft for back-to-back picks but Lewis earned his spot higher in the draft
with how quickly he exploded. He wasn’t ready to come straight out of high
school in 1998, but unlike most that are not ready early, he quickly figured it
out, going from scoring 2.4 ppg and putting down 1.3 rpg as a rookie to 14.8
and 6.9 numbers in his third year. All-Star appearances and 22.4 ppg in his
final year in Seattle netted him a
big paycheck from Orlando and while
he was never as valuable again, he still is a critical role player in the
league. Considering is longevity wanting to stay in Seattle ,
he probably would have long hauled it in Sacramento
to and became a great additional inside threat with Vlade Divac and Chris
Webber as they were starting their big run.
Pick 8: Philadelphia
76ers
Who they took: Larry Hughes
Who they should have took: Ricky Davis (21st
pick)
Why: Ricky Davis and Allen Iverson would have either been
the biggest clash of teammates in NBA history or been nasty together. Like
late-80’s Detroit kind of nasty.
The pick of the best player right here would be Jason Williams, but with a
flashy, tough as nails point guard (Iverson) already in the fold, it wouldn’t make
much sense. Davis ultimately proved
too selfish for the league, but showed signs of actual brilliance before LeBron
James stole his thunder in Cleveland .
The year before James entered the league, Davis
scored 20.6 ppg to lead the Cavaliers. And while all he led them to was the
first pick in the draft, he showed he could play. Sadly, he now knew he could
score in bunches, so giving up his touches to LeBron was not in his personal
game plan. He never played the same again. However, if he could have found that
rhythm without being “the guy,” like in Philly, he may have never lost his
scoring swagger.
Pick 9: Milwaukee
Bucks
Who they took: Dirk Nowitski (traded to Dallas )
Who they should have took: Jason Williams (7th
pick)
Why: The Milwaukee Bucks don’t even want to think about this
draft. Not even a little bit, not even at all. This was Charlotte Hornets bad.
They actually drafted Nowitski (who admittedly, isn’t Kobe )
and traded him for ROBERT “TRACTOR” TRAYLOR (who still isn’t Vlade Divac good).
Never pick a guy named after a semi. Always pick a guy who is nicknamed White
Chocolate. Williams helped turn around the Kings, though he had more help. Milwaukee
needed some flare and he had that by the buckets full.
Pick 10: Boston
Celtics
Who they took: Paul Pierce
Who they should have took: Al Harrington (25th
pick)
Why: The Celtics are like the Mavericks. Thank god there
really is no such thing as going back in time and re-drafting. With the
exception of Larry Bird, no pick in the history of their franchise has been as
important as this one was for Boston
(could that change this year?). And Al Harrington would have been downright disappointing
in comparison, but not all together disappointing. Like a lot of the later
drafted high school kids, his adjustment time was too long (in comparison to
Pierce), but he still developed into a dynamic player for a while. He was long
and physical and the Celtics were just throwing up draft picks at this point.
Harrington wouldn’t stick like Pierce did, but he still would have provided a
solid option for an ailing team. The downside? Without Pierce, no matter who
this pick was, they may still be ailing (as opposed to ailing again).
Pick 11: Detroit
Pistons
Who they took: Bonzi Wells
Who they should have took: Cuttino Mobley (41st
pick)
Why: Mobley is one of those guys that you know his name, but
you don’t give him much second thought unless you are a Cuttino Mobley or Rhode
Island fan. Detroit was seeing an end to the somewhat
disappointing (and injury filled) Grant Hill era and was trying to make things
click with a bevy of veterans to add some spice to whatever Grant could provide
that particular year. Adding Mobley may have not paid initial dividends, but
had he stayed in Detroit as long as he did in Houston (where he was drafted and
still averaged almost 10 ppg as a rookie), then he would have been highly
valuable in the thick of the Pistons’ championship run. He put up a career best
21.7 ppg and 1.5 spg in 2002 and then still put up 15.8 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 3.2 apg
and 1.3 spg in the Pistons championship season, which would have made them even
more unbeatable as another option.
Pick 12: Orlando
Magic
Who they took: Michael Doleac
Who they should have took: Larry Hughes (8th
pick)
Why: Orlando
needed a lot and although the pickings are slimmer at this point, they sure
aren’t Doleac-Clark-Harpring slim. Hughes was a hot shot freshman coming from Saint
Louis , with a game very reminiscent of Penny Hardaway
himself. It would have been like a younger, still a little raw version of Penny
working side by side with him in Orlando ,
which could have been pretty fun to watch.
Pick 13: Orlando
Magic
Who they took: Keon Clark
Who they should have took: Bonzi Wells (11th
pick)
Why: Not a lot of career Muncie ,
Indiana guys finding success in
the NBA, but Wells surely did. He would have played a lot as a rookie in
Orlando (not sure why he didn’t in Portland, where he was traded to before he
ever played a game) and therefore jumped up his scoring average quicker than he
was allowed to do in 7 games as a rookie. In between his first and last years
in Portland , he never played less
than 66 games, never shot worse than 44 percent from the field and like Mobley
was consistent in chipping in scoring, defense and rebounding.
Pick 14: Houston
Rockets
Who they took: Michael Dickerson
Who they should have took: Raef Lafrentz (3rd
pick)
Why: He wasn’t really a bust per say, but Lafrentz also
wasn’t third pick material (Denver
may have passed on Pierce, Nowitski, Carter, Jamison, Williams, etc.). Houston
would have been a place for him to develop inside without pressure where Denver
expected him to just take over after his success with Pierce at Kansas .
And while he finished his college career only behind Kansas
legend Danny Manning in scoring and rebounding, he sure wasn’t Danny Manning in
the pros. With Clyde Drexler’s retirement and before the Yao Ming era began,
Lafrentz could have helped make the Houston interior solid as he never averaged
under 12 points or 7 rebounds in his first four seasons, all in Denver.
Pick 15: Orlando
Magic
Who they took: Matt Harpring
Who they should have took: Sarunas Jasikevicius (undrafted)
Why: First of all, Orlando
needed everything. Second of all, Jasikevicius was before his time. Before the
basketball world required gun slinger point guards, Jasikevicius was doing it.
His style never really fit at Maryland
as a Lithuanian import and thus pro teams didn’t latch on to him. By the time
an NBA team did (the Indiana Pacers in 2005), it was too late. And although he
was still efficient, he had lost a step and couldn’t keep up with the new age,
young gun slinger guards in the league. But had someone taken a chance on him
at all in 1998, he himself could have been someone that revolutionized the
league from a flashy point guard perspective, much how Jason Williams, of the
same draft class, helped do. His leadership and ability have made him one of
the best Lithuanian born players ever and a shot in Orlando
would have been a perfect setting for him to get the chance before it was too late.
1 comment:
Seriously? You can't even get Nowitzki's Name right?
Post a Comment